Grunwald, Armin (2004) The case of nanobiotechnology. EMBO reports, 5 (Suppl 1). S32-S36. ISSN 1469-221X
Full text is not hosted in this archive but may be available via the Official URL, or by requesting a copy from the corresponding author.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400223
Scientific progress and technical innovations are necessary not only to raise, or at least to secure, our present level of prosperity and to ensure competitiveness in the global market, but also to progress further in medicine and sustainable development. On these points there is, to a great extent, consensus. Scientific and technical progress, however, do not produce only positive outcomes. New technologies have unintended side effects, such as hazards to the natural environment, to human health or to society at large. The ozone hole, the long unrecognized carcinogenic effects of asbestos and catastrophic accidents, such as Bhopal or Chernobyl, are well-known examples (Harremoes et al, 2002). This ambivalence of science and technology is largely acknowledged today, and has led to risk research, technology assessment and ethical reflection to anticipate, counter and minimize the negative effects (Grunwald, 2002).
|Subjects:||Social and Political Science > Societal and ethical aspects of nanotechnology|
|Deposited By:||M T V|
|Deposited On:||27 Apr 2010 13:49|
|Last Modified:||27 Apr 2010 13:49|
Repository Staff Only: item control page