Swierstra, Tsjalling and Rip, Arie (2007) Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology. Nanoethics, 1 (1). pp. 3-20. ISSN 1871-4757 (Print) 1871-4765 (Online)
|PDF - Published Version |
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Official URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/h6511385x1r6v3...
There might not be a specific nano-ethics, but there definitely is an ethics of new & emerging science and technology (NEST), with characteristic tropes and patterns of moral argumentation. Ethical discussion in and around nanoscience and technology reflects such NEST-ethics. We offer an inventory of the arguments, and show patterns in their evolution, in arenas full of proponents and opponents. We also show that there are some nano-specific issues: in how size matters, and when agency is delegated to smart devices. Our overall approach is a pragmatist ethics, and we conclude that struggle (and learning) might be more productive than models emphasizing consensus.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||New & emerging science and technology - Moral argumentation - Consequentialism - Opponents - Good life - Ethics - Ambivalences - Arena model|
|Subjects:||Social and Political Science > Societal and ethical aspects of nanotechnology|
|Deposited By:||M T V|
|Deposited On:||14 Jan 2009 10:38|
|Last Modified:||14 Jan 2009 10:38|
Repository Staff Only: item control page