Palmer, Clare (2011) Animal Disenhancement and the Non-Identity Problem: A Response to Thompson. NanoEthics, 5 (1). pp. 43-48. ISSN 1871-4757
Full text is not hosted in this archive but may be available via the Official URL, or by requesting a copy from the corresponding author.
Official URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/253k084q538265...
In his paper "The Opposite of Human Enhancement: Nanotechnology and the Blind Chicken problem" (Nanoethics 2:305-316, 2008) Paul Thompson argues that the possibility of "disenhancing" animals in order to improve animal welfare poses a philosophical conundrum. Although many people intuitively think such disenhancement would be morally impermissible, it's difficult to find good arguments to support such intuitions. In this brief response to Thompson, I accept that there's a conundrum here. But I argue that if we seriously consider whether creating beings can harm or benefit them, and introduce the non-identity problem to discussions of animal disehancement, the conundrum is even deeper than Thompson suggests.
|Subjects:||Social and Political Science > Societal and ethical aspects of nanotechnology|
|Deposited By:||M T V|
|Deposited On:||09 May 2011 10:55|
|Last Modified:||09 May 2011 10:55|
Repository Staff Only: item control page