Leontis, Vassiliki L. and Agich, George J. (2010) Freitas on Disease in Nanomedicine: Implications for Ethics. NanoEthics, 4 (3). pp. 205-214.
Full text is not hosted in this archive but may be available via the Official URL, or by requesting a copy from the corresponding author.
This paper critically examines the volitional normative model of disease and its underlying nanotechnologic vision of medicine both defended by Robert Freitas. Having provided an account of this vision, we explicate the highlight of the model, which is a concept of disease based on individual values and preferences. The model’s normative positions are then critiqued based on our argument that the epistemic basis of Freitas’s vision of nanotechnologic medicine and, by extension, of his volitional normative model of disease is scientifically flawed. An ethical and social critique of the model is then conducted on the basis of the model’s implicit ethical underpinnings.We argue that Freitas fails to justify the normativity of his model by not addressing the ethical issues that permeate it, one of which is the question of responsibility regarding the development of medical nanotechnology and the practice of new forms of medicine such as the one he envisions.We conclude that, due to its radically individualistic position, the model implies an unjustified view of nanoethics and relegates this field of ethics to the periphery of discussions of nanomedicine.
|Subjects:||Biomedical Science > Nanomedicine|
|Deposited On:||06 Jun 2011 07:52|
|Last Modified:||06 Jun 2011 07:52|
Repository Staff Only: item control page